record
Published:
Content
DFT calculation of 6 configuration of Cu-Cl-water molacule
- system energy
- transition pathway
- further
- optical absorption? can be use for UV spectrum reasoning
2025-05-22
free energy (formation energy?) calculation
single Cu
- /cucl/May23/cu singlecu2=-401.96197944 singlecu1=-403.07135668
single Cl
- /cucl/May23/cl singlecl=-34.88951178
H2O
- /cucl/May12/h2o singleh2o=-44.04153750
2025-05-23
drawing atomic model
- color
- Cu2+
- #650065
- #BE63BE
- #E3BDDC
- Cu1+
- #A35331
- #FFA57F
- #FF8653
- O
- #7E7E7E
- H
- #BFBFBF
- Cl
- #1EFFEF #23b8ae
- Cu2+
2025-05-25
- maybe not correct (not pure Cu-Cl complex but with other atoms)
- Cu(I)Cl2 bond distance (Cu-Cl) = 2.104 A
- angle=175.9deg
- Cu(I)Cl3 bond distance (Cu-Cl) = 2.165+-(12) A
- angle=120(+-1.5) reference: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6740/13/2/36
- Cu(H2O)6
- 6 coordinations structure
- bond distance
- in xy plane = 1.97A
- z = 2.38A
- /May25
- relaxing
- reference https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01110-6
- bond distance
- 5 coordinations structure
- /May22/6W5L
- relaxed scf finished
- cuh2o6l5=-667.01612658
- cuh2o6l5-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- -0.8049221400000306
- cuh2o6l5-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- reference https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp1000804
- /May22/6W5L
- 4 coordinations structures
- 2 variants
- 6W4L1
- /May22/6W4L1/
- relaxed scf finished
- cuh2o6l41=-666.99439952
- cuh2o6l41-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- -0.7831950800000413
- cuh2o6l41-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- 6W4L2
- /May22/6W4L2/
- relaxed scf finished
- cuh2o6l42=-667.06330550
- cuh2o6l42-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- -0.8521010599999954
- cuh2o6l42-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- cuh2o6l42=-667.06330550
- 6W4L1
- reference https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp1000804
- 2 variants
- 6 coordinations structure
- CuCl(H2O)5
- replace one h2o from 6W4L2
- /May23/5W1Cl
- relaxed scf finished
- cuclh2o5=-658.25247725
- cuclh2o5-singlecu2-singlecl-singleh2o*5
- -1.1932985299999928
- cuclh2o5-singlecu2-singlecl-singleh2o*5
- cuclh2o5=-658.25247725
- relaxed scf finished
- reference https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp1000804
- CuCl2(H2O)4
- replace two h2o form 6W4L1
- /May23/4W2Cl
- relased scf finished
- cucl2h2o4=-649.32743653
- cucl2h2o4-singlecu2-singlecl2-singleh2o4
- -1.4202835300000345
- cucl2h2o4-singlecu2-singlecl2-singleh2o4
- cucl2h2o4=-649.32743653
- relased scf finished
- reference https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp909092p
- Cu(I) chloride
- CuCl
- without water /May25/0W1Cl+1
- relaxing
- scf finished
- cucl=-438.29948177
- cucl-singlecu1-singlecl
- -0.3386133099999924
- cucl-singlecu1-singlecl
- cucl=-438.29948177
- may have 1 water molecule /May25/1W1Cl+1
- relaxing
- scf finished
- cuclh2o=-482.42694170
- cuclh2o-singlecu1-singlecl-singleh2o
- -0.42453573999998184
- cuclh2o-singlecu1-singlecl-singleh2o
- cuclh2o=-482.42694170
- reference https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01110-6
- without water /May25/0W1Cl+1
- CuCl2 -
- /May23/0W2Cl+1
- relaxed scf finished
- cucl2=-473.36700849
- cucl2-singlecu1-singlecl*2
- -0.5166282499999824
- cucl2-singlecu1-singlecl*2
- cucl2=-473.36700849
- relaxed scf finished
- reference https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01110-6
- /May23/0W2Cl+1
- CuCl3 2- at 25 C is found but with very weak bonded Cl-, at high Cl- concentration
- reference: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.09.015
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00052
- this paper pointed out, for Cu chloride, whatever valence, coordination number with Cl- increased with increasing Cl- ion concentration in solvation, predicted the existence of Cu(I)Cl3 2- even at low concentration.
- but my calculation cant predict the structure of Cu(I)Cl3 2-, this paper also not considered the structure but only the reaction
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.10.027
- Fig. 11
- CuCl2 to CuCl3 at room temperature, log K < 0, not that stable
- Fig. 11
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.09.015
- Fig .1 from reference
- CuCl3 dominate only at high Cl concentration, low pH (<9)
- Fig .1 from reference
- CuCl
- Cl(H2O)6
- /May25/Cl6W-1/
- relaxed scf finished
- clh2o6=-299.28590227
- clh2o6-singlecl-singleh2o*6
- -0.14716549000002033
- clh2o6-singlecl-singleh2o*6
- clh2o6=-299.28590227
- relaxed scf finished
- reference https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP50652E
- chloride ion prefer coordinated with six water molecules, symmetrically H-bonding
- essential degeneracy between water-water and water-Cl H-bonding, strong similarity in the water and chloride electronic structure
- reference https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2015.1059959
- PBE vdW XC AIMD, sixfold Cl-O coordination is dominated, in the first solvation shell surrounding the Cl- ion
- O-Cl-O angular distribution showing $theta\approx 75 \degree$, indicating distorted trigonal prismatic structures
- /May25/Cl6W-1/
2025-05-26
energy diagram drawing
atomic model
- /May26
results
- atomic model
- free energy (formation energy differnece)
- cuh2o6l5
- cuh2o6l41
- cuclh2o5
- cucl2h2o4
- cu(I)cl
- cucl(I)h2o
- cu(I)cl2
- Win11: Desktop/Cuion/model-2025May26/results_2025May26
doing:
- Cl(H2O)6
not yet done:
- 3W2Cl
- modeling
- 4W1Cl1
- 4W1Cl2
- 5W5L
2025-05-27
doing:
- Cl(H2O)6
- relaxing
- 3W2Cl
- relaxing
- 4W1Cl1
- relaxing
- 4W1Cl2
- relaxing
- 5W5L
- relaxing
- methods
- SI
- graphing
Results
singleatom
singlecu2=-401.96197944 singlecu1=-403.07135668 singlecl=-34.88951178 singleh2o=-44.04153750
Cu2+
5L
- 3W2Cl
- [CuCl2(H2O)3]0
- cucl2h2o3=-605.21675997
- cucl2h2o3-singlecu2-singlecl*2-singleh2o*3
- -1.3511444700000368
- -18.38326632
- 4W1Cl1
- [CuCl(H2O)4]1+
- cuclh2o4l1=-614.15869898
- cuclh2o4l1-singlecu2-singlecl-singleh2o*4
- -1.1410577600000806
- -15.52488957
- 4W1Cl2
- [CuCl(H2O)4]1+
- cuclh2o4l2=-614.13798055
- cuclh2o4l2-singlecu2-singlecl-singleh2o*4
- -1.1203393299999789
- -15.24300082
- 5W5L
- [Cu(H2O)5]2+
- cuh2o5=-622.85887760
- cuh2o5-singlecu2-singleh2o*5
- -0.6892106600000432
- -9.377193477
6L
- 4W2Cl1
- [CuCl2(H2O)4]0
- cucl2h2o41=-649.32743653
- cucl2h2o41-singlecu2-singlecl*2-singleh2o*4
- -1.4202835300000345
- -19.32395162
- 4W2Cl2
- [CuCl2(H2O)4]0
- cucl2h2o42=-649.31965224
- cucl2h2o42-singlecu2-singlecl*2-singleh2o*4
- -1.4124992400000167
- -19.21804090966823
- 5W1Cl
- [CuCl(H2O)5]1+
- cuclh2o5=-658.25247725
- cuclh2o5-singlecu2-singlecl-singleh2o*5
- -1.1932985299999928
- -16.23566181
- 6W4L1
- [Cu(H2O)6]2+
- cuh2o6l41=-666.99439952
- cuh2o6l41-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- -0.7831950800000413
- -10.6559173
- 6W4L2
- [Cu(H2O)6]2+
- cuh2o6l42=-667.06330550
- cuh2o6l42-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- -0.8521010599999954
- -11.59343139
- 6W5L
- [Cu(H2O)6]2+
- cuh2o6l5=-667.01612658
- cuh2o6l5-singlecu2-singleh2o*6
- -0.8049221400000306
- -10.95152916
Cu1+
- 0W1Cl+1
- [CuCl]0
- cucl=-438.29948177
- cucl-singlecu1-singlecl
- -0.3386133099999924
- -4.607071112
- 1W1Cl+1
- [CuClH2O]0
- cuclh2o=-482.42694170
- cuclh2o-singlecu1-singlecl-singleh2o
- -0.42453573999998184
- -5.776105918
- 0W2Cl+1
- [CuCl2]1-
- cucl2=-473.36700849
- cucl2-singlecu1-singlecl*2
- -0.5166282499999824
- -7.029088981
Cl-1
- Cl6W-1
- [Cl(H2O)6]1-
- clh2o6=-299.28590227
- clh2o6-singlecl-singleh2o*6
- -0.14716549000002033
- -2.002289507
Reference
- 2+ CuH2O and CuClH2O different configuration
- reference https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp1000804
- 2+ CuCl2H2O different configuration
- reference https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp909092p
- DFT calculation MIT Chem
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01026
- B3LYP
- single point
- 1+ Cu
- XAFS 2000
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01110-6
- Cu1+ linear monochloro and dichloro species
- no observes of chloride with higher coordination
- AIMD 2007 Sherman
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.09.015
- predict CuCl3 and CuCl4 at high concentration
- AIMD 2013 Mei
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.10.027
- low formation constant of CuCl3
- XAS 2007 Brugger
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.08.003
- only at very high concentration
- Raman 2013 Applegarth
- https://doi.org/10.1021/jp406580q
- CuCl3 only at very high concentration
- dft predicted linear
- but dft can predict CuCl3 structure
- XAFS 2000
- Cl-
- reference https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP50652E
- chloride ion prefer coordinated with six water molecules, symmetrically H-bonding
- essential degeneracy between water-water and water-Cl H-bonding, strong similarity in the water and chloride electronic structure
- reference https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2015.1059959
- PBE vdW XC AIMD, sixfold Cl-O coordination is dominated, in the first solvation shell surrounding the Cl- ion
- O-Cl-O angular distribution showing $theta\approx 75 \degree$, indicating distorted trigonal prismatic structures
2025-06-03
ADF in AMS
- reference https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP50652E
- Task - Geometry Optimization
- Frequencies - Yes
- Total charge
- Unrestricted - Yes
- XC functional - Hybrid:B3LYP
- Basis set - QZ4P
- Frozen core - None
- Numerical quality - Normal
- Properties
- Thermodynamics
- Pressure - 1.0 atm
- Temperatures - 298.15 K
- Thermodynamics
can get
- Entropy (cal/mol-K)
- Energy from Engine (eV)
- Internal Energy U (eV)
- Gibbs free energy (eV)
6W4L1
- Entropy (cal/mol-K)
- 119.220
- Energy from Engine (eV)
- -89.2638
- Internal Energy U (eV)
- -84.7040
- Gibbs free energy (eV)
- -86.2197
5W1Cl
- Entropy (cal/mol-K)
- 126.074
- Energy from Engine (eV)
- -85.9135
- Internal Energy U (eV)
- -82.0349
- Gibbs free energy (eV)
- -83.6392
4W2Cl
- Entropy (cal/mol-K)
- 115.666
- Energy from Engine (eV)
- -78.9343
- Internal Energy U (eV)
- -75.7699
- Gibbs free energy (eV)
- -77.2396
0W1Cl+1
- Entropy (cal/mol-K)
- 56.645
- Energy from Engine (eV)
- -5.3202
- Internal Energy U (eV)
- -5.2226
- Gibbs free energy (eV)
- -5.9292
1W1Cl+1
- Entropy (cal/mol-K)
- 72.495
- Energy from Engine (eV)
- -23.6026
- Internal Energy U (eV)
- -22.7601
- Gibbs free energy (eV)
- -23.6717
0W2Cl+1
- Entropy (cal/mol-K)
- 68.008
- Energy from Engine (eV)
- -13.2151
- Internal Energy U (eV)
- -13.0357
- Gibbs free energy (eV)
- -13.8893